Emergency plan for government communication

However, they also pose risks that cannot be ignored, as digitalisation opens the door to cyberattacks. Government agencies handle countless sensitive data daily, which often attract criminal interest. Recent cyberattacks have demonstrated that the failure of email infrastructure can lead to significant disruptions. This makes it essential for government agencies to establish an emergency communication plan.

Depending on the agency and the nature of the attack, this could range from a minor inconvenience that hinders routine operations to a major security risk, such as those involving the Federal Office for Equipment, Information Technology, and Utilisation of the Bundeswehr. It is therefore crucial for agencies to take proactive measures to protect against such scenarios and implement alternative communication channels as backups, such as secure communication platforms.

How can such failures occur?

The increasing interconnection of government systems and advancing digitalisation have enabled cybercriminals to execute ever more sophisticated attacks. Here are some scenarios that could lead to the failure of government infrastructure:

• Cyberattack: A targeted attack, such as a Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attack, overwhelms email servers, causing them to crash.

• Ransomware Attack: Ransomware could infiltrate an agency’s network, encrypting or disrupting email infrastructure, making access to emails and data impossible.

• Phishing Attack: If employees fall for fraudulent emails and disclose their login credentials, attackers can use this information to compromise the email infrastructure.

• Hardware or Software Failure: Issues such as power outages, hardware malfunctions, or faulty software updates can disrupt email operations.

What are the potential impacts?

The versatility of email use in government communication is matched by the variety of potential impacts if email infrastructure fails.

• Communication Bottlenecks: Email is often the primary means of communication within government agencies, both internally and with citizens. A failure can hinder information sharing, delay responses to inquiries, and disrupt the flow of updates.

• Delays in Decision-Making: Critical information exchanges for decision-making or approvals often occur via email. A disruption can slow decision-making processes, delaying the handling of applications, projects, or internal workflows.

• Manual Alternatives: Without email, agencies may resort to alternative methods like phone calls or physical documents, which are time-consuming and resource-intensive. This transition can disrupt workflows and demand additional resources.

• Compliance Issues: Shifting to manual processes can make it harder to adhere to compliance standards, with physical documents more prone to being lost or falling into the wrong hands.

• Impact on External Communication: Agencies frequently interact with citizens, other agencies, suppliers, and partners via email. Disruptions can impede responses to inquiries, information exchange, and announcements, undermining public trust and causing frustration.

Conclusion

To manage such scenarios effectively, government agencies must implement alternative communication channels independent of email infrastructure, such as secure browser-based platforms. Establishing an emergency communication plan ensures that agencies are prepared and able to maintain communication continuity in the face of disruptions.

Image: dencg/shutterstock.com